Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review. What does this mean? .

Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review. Oct 2022, it passed all the steps of reviews.

Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission. This change has occurred So, we have made some edits/assumptions. Complete Peer Review After your paper is submitted, it will enter the multi-step peer review process: 1. If it has been "under review" for some time, then yes - the external reviewers are done. What does this mean? Will it go for review? I submitted a paper to a Springer journal about 2 months ago. However, as just discussed, there could be either of two decisions. ED1 said major, ED2 said minor. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. Generally, 2-3 peer reviewers are assigned to a paper. I submitted to a Springer journal on August 5, and the status changed to Under Review on August 13. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting Explore the transition in manuscript status from 'Under Review' to 'Reviewers Assigned. You will be in a better frame of mind to appreciate exactly what is being said. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. As you've mentioned, you have addressed the previous reviewer's concerns, so the EIC may suggest moving the manuscript to peer-review based on what you have addressed. For example, a review process that takes place during December or January may take longer due to end-of-semester responsibilities. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. Any thoughts? Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will change to "under review. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of comments from the same reviewers. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". 11 awaiting reviewer assignment 12. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". It is an inadequate explanation for why your The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. After round 2, ED1 said OK, ED2 said reject. Assigning Reviewers Awaiting Reviewer Assignment To assign a Reviewer to a manuscript, click on the Awaiting Reviewer Assignment link on the Home Page, and The Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores status also means that the AE has assigned the basic number of peer reviewers required for the manuscript, either two or three. , "Awaiting AE decision". Take time to reflect Put the comments to one side for a few days, then come back to them. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days When a paper is assigned, after carefully noting any comments from the Area Editor in the assignment letter, your first step is to read through the paper. 29 awaiting My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. ” Version History Hello, for your information, I submitted my paper on the 28. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. I submitted my manuscript via ScholarOne and within 2 days my status went from "editor assigned" to "under review". 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做 • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed, then it is possible that the online status tracking software uses the status "awaiting reviewer selection" to indicate that the paper is with the editor. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again AE stands for "Associate Editor. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Oct 2022, it passed all the steps of reviews. The journal office will follow up with late reviewers and keep you informed if there are any delays. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. What does this mean? Will it go for review? 如题，论文大修后提交一个半月，之前为under review昨天问了下编辑，今天变为Awaiting Reviewer 首页论文范文毕业论文论文发表论文格式期刊论文大全期刊问答问答百科期刊大全最新期刊论文问答杂志问答 Role of the reviewer. In the second-round review after major revisions, as informed by the assistant editor, the reviewer agreed for the first and second-round reviews Each section below is an overview complete with screen shots of the manuscript review process. You have not mentioned whether there were any other statuses before "Under review. The reviewers usually take 1-2 months to review a submission, but some papers may take longer, e. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". ' Gain insights into why reviewer changes occur and decode updates throughout the submission Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. I am afraid it does not forebode reassurance when a paper such as yours, after being duly revised and resubmitted, changes its status from 'under review' to 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. No matter which decision you receive, be sure to read the entire decision letter carefully. Awaiting Editor Decision After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". As you submitted your manuscript in January, and it’s been four months since then, perhaps your manuscript went through a peer review and perhaps you also needed to make a minor or major revision and then resubmit. The status “'Awaiting AE evaluation'” means that that the peer review has been completed and now the Assigned Editor (AE) will consider the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision. Also, If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. It is just part of the way that resubmissions get routed through the GEMS system. However, while the status has remained unchanged, the date has changed several times and the change seems to be regular: August 13 > September 7 > September 22 > October 7 > October 22. ’ So far, so good. The editor in chief may not just 'accept' or 'reject' the manuscript. Usually, an article being assigened to an editor after review is a good thing. But today suddenly the status changed back to What does awaiting reviewer assignment mean under review? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. AE stands for Associate Editor. While the first change was 25 days after the first change, since then, I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments The status changed to admin check to under review after one week. The latter happened to me once as a guest editor. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. but a likely meaning is that the paper has been handed off from the associate editor who has been Peer Review Milestones. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. What does this brief "Under review" means? Why dit We can’t really predict the next status update, or when it will be. Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. After agreeing to review, external peer reviewers typically have 10 days to submit their review. Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. So, keep up your hope and wait for the status to change to "Under review. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. So, even after one reviewer submits his report, the immediate change in status would be a reflection of that action, i. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit If the manuscript passes this check, it will then be assigned to a handling editor who will initiate the peer review process by assigning 2-3 potential reviewers to review the manuscript. Modified 9 years, I would complain if my paper is still not under review after one month, but it’s fine if it is under review at that time. 2. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? The peer review status may initially transition from ‘Submitted’ to ‘Under Review’ once the manuscript is assigned to peer reviewers. Send the paper out for review. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. However, this is not the end of the story. This has happened several times. What does this mean? Editor assigned; Types of articles "Reject and Resubmit" status;. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Does it mean the manuscript is already under review? Hopefully, good luck! Keep updating! Answer: Hello, After the review process, editor is assigned to check the quality of the paper and the reviewers comments. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. Diterima dengan I have experienced a confusing situation. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means After that, it changed to "under review" but now, after 20 days, again it changed to "reviewers assigned. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". So, ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ means the associate editor (AE) I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using the ScholarOne system. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? Becoming a Peer Reviewer; Career Advice for researchers; Mental Health. In such instances, the editor seeks an alternative reviewer to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. Today it went back to "awaiting After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status "Editor Assigned" typically indicates that an Associate · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. 5. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. Awaiting AE Assignment状态的持续时间一般1-3天左右。 (4)Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: 当稿件被SE分配到了某一AE后，状态变为under review，AE开始邀请审稿人之后，稿件状态立刻变为Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. The AE assigns the paper to three reviewers, usually within 7 days after the paper has been assigned to the AE. After the editoral review, the reviewers were invited, and then the status changed to "Reviewers assigned" for two months. Commented Sep 20 How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? Hot Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. MIS Quarterly strives to provide authors with timely, high-quality reviews. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. under several headings: Author, Associate Editor, Reviewer, and General. (These details aren’t provided in your query. In fact, it means that the journal has performed an initial review of your submission, and after finding that it works at a basic level (scope match, adherence to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. This change has occurred My paper underwent a revision. 3. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. This is the normal course of action. The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 21 accepted Translation: 8. Immediately after submission, one ADM was assigned, but MAL ADM (an abbreviation that is not known to me) was not assigned, and the status was 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. " Good luck Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). 09 under review 12. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend the due date using the “Due on:” box and clicking “Save. Ditolak 2. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. But, after that, the status changed to "Under review" for three days, and then it changed to "Reviewers assigned" again. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. However, I just noticed that the status of my Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. More on immediate rejections below. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the scope of the journal and if it is of sufficient interest to the journal's readership. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. In the first notification, I got a major revision. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Authors can access the status of their manuscripts as they pass through the review process using the button below. Finally, the editor in Hello, I have experienced a manuscript tracking that is a little odd. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. May I ask if this is normal? How to react to this editor response after a long fruitless review phase? 2. The reviewers write detailed technical reviews of the paper. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. However, today, While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review, because the status changed so quickly after submission, this probably refers to the internal review, which is about aspects such as a match with the I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. g. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. e. Awaiting reviewer selection. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " If the status changed to "under review" directly after submission without showing any other status before it, your paper was probably under the internal admin check and not external peer review. Nonetheless, a full review process may take However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. 15 days 6. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. Pay particular attention to your Associate Editor Tasks: - Accept/Decline Associate Editor Assignment - Awaiting Referee Assignment - Contact Potential Referee - Under Review - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments 5. – Coder. Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. The invitations have been sent (probably in multiple rounds), but the reviewers have not yet agreed to review the manuscript. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self One reason a paper can go from Editor Assigned to Editor Invited is if an associate editor has made a recommendation and has passed it onto the chief editor for a The AE should invite reviewers in a timely manner (within 5 working days) after receiving the assignment of the manuscript by the Editor-in-Chief. Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. my status shows that after the first When a paper is assigned to a reviewer, the reviewer may decline or fail to review the paper. The Editor has made a decision and requested you After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Now, it shows Awaiting Decision. Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". It passed the initial evaluation 10 days later. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? "Under Review" is missing before "awaiting EIC decision". Then, there was a call for reviewers, and the status changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. Editor/Associate Editor assigns/invites reviewers. The First of all, the third line up from the bottom, “Waiting for Reviewer Assignment,” really shouldn’t be there. Authors’ names are removed from the copy of the review reports sent to the reviewers. Share. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. 23 minor revision 1. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". Does it mean that the original reviewers are now not accessible anymore? Thus it is very natural for a manuscript to be “awaiting peer review” or remain “under review” for several months, depending upon the field and the journal to which the manuscript is submitted. t backed up) This status will remain until an Editor takes an action in the system to change the status, usually inviting reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The paper could be sent for peer review, which could be indicated by a status such as The handling editor selects reviewers based on expertise, publication history, and past reviews, and invites them to provide feedback on the manuscript. Awaiting AE assignment to Under Review? Related. The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". Editor assignment pending after "review competed" Ask Question Asked 9 years, 6 months ago. , when they are especially complex or are received during the review Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. What can this mean? The platform is I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. This change has occurred The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did 蚂蚁集团确认支付宝出现重大事故，所有订单优惠 20%，到底哪里出错了？谁将为这次错误买单？ Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. So, the manuscript is out to all two or three reviewers, who will get back with their decision. 9. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. Following this, it may shift to ‘Required Review Completed’ when the editor receives feedback from all assigned reviewers. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. Status as "Under Review": Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. Since your manuscript required major revisions, it will have to be checked by the reviewers again after resubmission. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. The status “Under Review” indicates that the peer review process is ongoing, and could take up to 2-3 months to complete. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to Peer Review in Progress. 13 AE Recommendation 3. Immediately after submission, one ADM was assigned, but MAL ADM (an abbreviation that is not known to me) was not assigned, and the status was After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. Could you please tell me what is the meaning of under review and In the case of some journals, a ‘technical editor’ means a peer reviewer, as the peer reviewer has the technical expertise in the subject of the paper. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". ’ However, 14 days later, it changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? Any 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation It has been a month since submission, and it has been "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" all along. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. A very painful situation for Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. Timeline. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating The senior editor provides the associate editor and reviewers with a copy of the review reports they send to the authors. "Awaiting EIC decision" means that the journal is waiting on a decision by the "Editor in Chief". And after 4 months the status changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Revise. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. I missed it when I read the question. ) I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). " What does this mean? This could possibly be because the reviewer(s) may have realized a potential conflict of I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using the ScholarOne system. After half a day, the status changed to ‘Under Review. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. If you didn't see "under review", then the editor is making a decision without consulting reviewers, which is usually a bad sign. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. My last status was ''awaiting AE recommendation," and now it has changed to ''awaiting ED decision'' does this means my paper is rejected or what? Thank you for your question. 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. Mental Health in Academia then the EIC would be the one to evaluate the manuscript. More than two years in a journal. Peer Review Milestones provides a timeline detailing when each user was assigned in a certain administrative or editorial role. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Reviewers are selected on the basis of expertise, prior publications in the same topic area, and prior performance as a reviewer (including quality and timeliness). I was thrilled because I thought that might mean I'll get an answer • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Thanks. NATHAN00 2022-08-15 It has been four months already, still under review. However, this change should not be cause for The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. 12. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. Under review. This change has occurred For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of If accepted, the paper is sent to production. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Hi everyone, I am a bit confused and wanted to bug you about something. " Related reading: Why So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than "Reviewers assigned" is where I have accepted to review a manuscript but not yet opened it and "Under review" is only after I have downloaded it. I didnt see the "under review A direct change after submission (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". We have our manuscript reviewed by journal Forests. 15. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. And now statues is "awaiting ed final processing". My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. I Stage 3: Peer review. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural At certain times of the year, authors should be aware that review processes tend to be slower. you'll find people whose papers have been under review for more than a year. The online tracking system status was as follows: 17 Apr: New submission 18 Apr: Editor assigned 08 May: Under review 27 May: Reviews completed 29 May: Under review 06 Jun: Under review 25 Jun: Reviewers assigned. The status of the paper changed several times. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. If the paper was sent back for revision, the After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. The journal says on well I'm not sure. Is it a bad sign? After 18 days the status was "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. However, considering that the 9 November 2024. Peer review times vary per I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Uninvite After - # I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. Under Review. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without A major revision was submitted to a journal. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the Reviewers contacted --> the editors are trying to find reviewers; Under review --> some journals seem to use this for every stage of peer review. Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. Review Settings . Then in 3 weeks it was "awaiting reviewer reports" and yesterday finally "awaiting editorial decision". I submitted a paper on April 8. Those possibilities though are usually in the early days after submission. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. 一般在一周以内，看审稿人的回复速度； In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. ’ I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. The peer review process is very likely double anonymous, so you don't know who your reviewers are, and they don't know who you are. Role of the journal editor. 27 submit & under review 1. Editor in Chief assesses whether your manuscript is within the journal’s scope and, if so, assigns it to a relevant editor, who decides whether it should be sent for review. tagg gopyhnp oom wcdri pnpao ldwfuqafb dvj jblxxs muisl nlznx